freddie or not
i get that part of the fun of having a team you support is talking about all the possible scenarios with your team. you get to discuss with friends, or other avatars on the internet, who you think should start, who should be benched and what line ups are most effective. hell, that is pretty much most of what i do.
so i don’t want to read toooooooooooooooo much into this… but there is already a surprisingly strong contingent of folks that are grumbling about their thoughts of not playing ljungberg. really? really????
for those that want to suggest that i am awe struck by freddie being european and our designated player… no, that isn’t it. what i am, is well aware of EVERYTHING that freddie has accomplished, and everything he provides.
no, we can’t start a guy b/c he WAS good. but we can start a guy b/c he has pretty much more international experience than anyone else in the team, the exception being keller. we can start the guy b/c he has played with the best in the world. we can start the guy b/c other than zakuani, he is the only option in midfield that has shown consistent creative play. we can start the guy b/c the other players look up to him. we can start the guy b/c he is just coming into his full fitness. and for the lofve of god, we can’t bench a guy who most people think will be probably your most influential field player after completing 2 full games.
most of you are praising the FO for the decisions they made with putting together the rest of the team. so don’t you think that they know what they are doing? if yes… then do you think the all of a sudden got stupid with freddie?
we need a little sumfin called patience.
HE HAS ONLY COMPLETED 2 GAMES. 2 games people. and, in those 2 games, we have had no width, we were down to ten men in one of them, we played away in the other… etc etc. and to be honest, if montero had finished with even 1/2 as much skill as most of his other goals, we would be lauding ljungberg for the assist, and lets face it, evans could never make that pass.
now, i am not a freddie apologist by nature, there is clearly some parts of his game that he has to fix, improve, cut out. namely, getting pushed off the ball too easily. this is something that he will have to learn b/c even at full strenghth, he isn’t the spring chicken he used to be. normally, back in the day, he could just dribble away from most of them. he has to learn that he isn’t that guy any more and needs to pass a little bit more, or learn to ride some tackles. i personally cringed at the amount that he went down in the chivas game (and the kc game for that matter). but i am willing to cut him some slack.
so what is the answer? well, as i have said before… i like the width. the width gives you more than the obvious runs down the wing. the width opens up the middle. when evans had zak and/or nyassi on the wing, did he look better b/c he is better? or b/c he had time? i am not bagging on evans at all. i am just saying that if we gave that time to freddie, and fredy for that matter, we would not be having these conversations.
i think that sigi has eluded to that a bit, especially after the chivas game. so we will see what happens.
i don’t know if i have made a point, probably not. but whether you love ljungberg or not….TWO GAMES!!!!!!!!!!!!
if you can’t see us not starting evans, then i think i have the solution….
for me, we may need to give jaqua a little bit of something to fight for. montero has proven that he only needs a sniff at goal, but if pressed too strongly, he may not get that sniff. this means he likely needs the creative play to help him get that sniff (what, does montero have a coke problem all of a sudden?).
well jaqua has a great work rate, but so does le toux, and so does the guy that cleans the community pool. work rate is a nice warm fuzzy, but the term is given too much credit. for me, nate has been absent a little too much.
a 4-5-1 that looks a little like this may be the answer, or at least, may be a good option against certain opposition
montero
ljungberg
zak evans nyassi
alonso.
not saying jaqua’s height isn’t valuable… but we can’t go out with the same formation every time.
is it time to mix it up? your thoughts?
ok, time to put away the keyboard and pick up the bottle of beer.





TL Reply:
April 22nd, 2009 at 7:34 pm
Ljundberg did have other offers and hadn’t made a decision. He got injured at West Ham and is why he did not do so well. The team bought out his contract, due to the owners failing bank. Not saying you are bashing, but just want the info real. After 20 games and no production. Ok. Anyone questioning the ability of Freddy L. now is just trying to hate. He has been nothing but gracious to our city and nothing but underwhelming in his personality. Nothing like Beckham. (Although, I have much respect for Beckham. Another topic )