Understanding MLS part 1 of 4: Allocation Money

Posted by yamsmos on April 19, 2010 · Under Articles, MLS · View Comments 

allocationone of the things that is baffling to me, and many of you, is the inner rules of MLS. we know why these rules and systems are being used as they are doing all they can to not go the way of NASL.  well ok, it isn’t just for that, but you can look at most of the complex inner workings of how this business was set up underneath the ”let’s not do another NASL” umbrella.

but i am not too proud to say that they are F’ing confusing and i know that i am not alone in this opinion. many of them are unlike any other sport, many of them aren’t published (or at least not up to date) and i can say with confidence, that most fans cannot explain them to another fan. for a while, i hung my head down in shame, not able to look another fan in the eye…. what if he asked me what i though of our use of our allocation money in order to secure montero??? what would i say? but then, about a month ago, i sat in a room with Joe Roth and Drew Carey and they too were asking for clarification from Adrian… so, if the owners don’t always know, well, you and i can be forgiven as well.

so let’s take a look at 4 of the most talked about rules and try to break them down… .

oh, and you are in luck, i am not going to be the one explaining.

last week, i was on the goal seattle board, and for the first time, i read a clear, concise and easy to understand description of all the rules around allocation money. it was so easily digestible, that again, i felt silly for not knowing all of it, but then again, maybe this was the first time in the history of the earth that it had been written in such a simple way. anyway, i reached out to the poster of such fine words and asked him if he would write up a few posts for us. he said sure, and hopefully it is as useful and informative to you, as it was for me. btw, he asked us to call him Gilby and he even uses capital letters… so those of you that hate my punctuation, or lack there of, enjoy.

  • Part 2 – The new collective bargaining agreement
  • Part 3 – How MLS negotiates and signs contracts
  • Part 4 – The new home grown player rule

and without further wait…

Part 1 Allocation Money the Abridge version.

By Gilby

In the world of MLS Jargon one word causes more confusion than any other; Allocation.  It doesn’t help that MLS uses the word to refer to two separate an unrelated roster rules.  The first is the Allocation list which determines the order in which MLS teams can pick returning U.S. National team players.  The Second which I’m going to go over today is Allocation Money.

What is Allocation Money?

Allocation Monies are funds that teams can use to exceed the set cap of 2.55 million or to exceed the individual salary maximum. They are provided by the league and paid by the league. Teams can use the allocation funds on one of three ways:

  1. They can use those funds to pay a onetime transfer fee to acquire a player.
  2. They can be used to buy down a player’s salary either partially or to pay their whole salary.
  3. They can be used to buy down a designated players cap hit reducing their impact on the overall salary cap.

There are some caveats Allocation Money cannot be used to reduce the cap hit of an existing contract and in most cases you cannot use Allocation Money to resign an existing player unless approved by the league.

How does a team get Allocation Money?

When you look up the official regulation about how Allocation Money is the dispersed this is what you get:

A club receives allocation money for (1) poor performance during the preceding MLS regular season; (2) the transfer of a player to a club outside of MLS for value; (3) roster purposes due to expansion status; and/or (4) exceptional circumstances as approved by the Competition Committee.

So you can receive allocation dollars if you are a. Bad b. sell a player to a foreign league c. are an expansion franchise or d. any reason the MLS sees fit.   The other problem here is that although we know Allocation Money exists MLS does not publish when Allocation Money is granted or how much it is. The only specific amount that is published revolves around the Allocation Funds a team can receive by selling a player.  In this case the team typically receives 2/3rd of that fee and up to $650,000 can be used as Allocation Money.

Why is Allocation Money important?

Allocation Money has a number of advantages in addition to being able sign a player over and beyond the cap and salary maximums.  Allocation Money can be traded , last year Seattle reportedly gave up a 100k in Allocation Money to acquire Tyrone Marshall.  It can also be used to buy down the impact and cost of a Designated Player.  In the past a Designated Player would take up $415,000 in cap space almost 20% of a team’s total cap.  The new rule has lowered that number to $335,000 and now allows teams to use Allocation Money to buy down that cap hit to $150,000.  What this all means is that if you can acquire enough Allocation money you can basically have three Designated Players while taking up same cap space as one player last year.

  • K61

    Good post.  Is there any way to tell who the recipients of the allocation money were from the posted salaries on the player’s union site?

    Also, I’d love to see a part 5 covering the other allocation.  I remember that when we signed Kasey Keller it was noted that we had used our allocation ranking in order to do so.  Here’s the article on that: http://www.mlssoccer.com/content/sounders-fc-ink-keeper-keller

  • jt

    Warning – the more we understand the “money” in MLS, the more direct our complaints can become :D

  • Gilby

    Hey K61, the MLS goes out of its way to not publish the recipients of Allocations or how much they’ve recived.  We know that teams that miss the playoffs get Allocation Money but no one has a good idea as to how much or whether it even tierd based on how bad they are.  We also know that expansion teams get around a million is allocation dollare. Also when a player gets sold the other team will ususally publish the amount making it easy to figuire out the MLS team’s share and the allocation amount.

  • soundersfcfanboy

    I don’t understand why a team cares to distinguish between buying down a designated players cap hit and raising the cap when the only reason I see for buying down a designated players cap hit would be to bring that players cap number below $335K/$415K in the old model.  I thought I read in the new model, where a team can have 3 DP’s, all for $335K cap hit a piece that buying down the cap hit wouldn’t affect whether that player was considered a DP.  In fact I’ve heard just the opposite, where if you have a player who is making more than $335K you MUST designate that player a DP.
     
    So all that being said, you aren’t buying down a DP’s salary.  You are raising your salary cap. 
     
    For example, if the Sounders have $100K allocation money to spend, it doesn’t matter if they buy down FL’s cap number from $335 to $235 or Vagenas from $158K to $58K.  It’s a wash in the end. 
     
    Like I stated above, the ONLY reason I can see buying down a DP rather than Joe Blow’s slary would be so you wouldn’t use up your DP slots.  My interpretation of the rules around buying down DP slots though might be wrong, and I’d love it if someone could proof that for me…  K

  • soundersfcfanboy

    Also, just an FYI, I think the amount of transfer fee went up to 3/4rs from 2/3rds, and that number is based on the number of years in the league or with a team, or something  like that.  I actually couldn’t find it when I went looking for it, but footiebusiness.com alludes to it over at http://footiebusiness.com/2010/04/09/mls-adds-incentives-for-adding-younger-players/

  • Gilby

    Fan Boy:  The 3/4rs number only applies if the player is “Home Grown”  they’ve also changedthe rules for drafted GA players so teams now recieve a graduated amount depending on years of service ranging from 1/3 for 1year up to 2/3rds after 3 years.  For all other player transfers the amount remains 2/3rds

    For the allocation example remeber that Allocation Money can only be used to sign new players not buy dow the cap hit of existing players salaries so their is a distinction.

      I’ve not heard about any rule that automatically signing a player for over the 335K figuire would make him a DP.  Having said that if you have a DP slot available and are going to sign a player for the leauge max of 400k it make sense that you would make him a dp to lessen the cap hit.

  • soundersfcfanboy

    @Gilby

    Thanks for diving into all this (mess).  I think one thing that *might* help generate interest in the MLS would be fantasy leagues.  Then again it might not…  but it sure doesn’t help when figuring out the economics of it all is so complicated.  It’s really frustrating when you can’t have a conversation about it with folks who don’t follow the MLS.

    Thanks again!

  • Sam

    Ah, so that’s why there’s no incentive to be good in this league.

  • Mark

    Great post Gilby!  I was always curious about the inner-workings of the MLS.

    How do you know so much of this Gilby? I am guessing you work in the MLS, possibly even at the Sounders FO?

  • Tom Paine

    Is the “home grown” rule the reason that the Galaxy can afford Donovan and Beckham? (Donovan being from Ontario CA). Cause that’s 6.5 million per year just for those two players.  Just the buydown alone on Beckham’s DP contract is insane.

  • Gilby

    Mark: not that lucky just a longtime MLS fan.

    Tom:  The “Home Grown” rule which I will touch on later only applies to players who have graduated from a teams academy team like Bill Hamid at DC United so Landon would not fit under that rule.  Many will and have argued that when it comes to the Galaxy the MLS will bend rules to allow them to fit under the cap.  The most recent example of this came when Donovan’s salary was “grandfathered” into the DP slot effectivley giving them an addtional DP spot when that rule was created back in 2007.

  • Tom Paine

    Thanks Gilby,

    BTW, I’m OK with the MLS bending the rules to help teams keep their stars (and sign big name players).

    I understand the need for a young league like the MLS to have parity, because parity ensures an even playing field for every team to remain competitive. 

    But IMO in order for the MLS to prosper and be taken seriously on a global level, it needs to pull in not only the casual sports fan, but the jaded soccer fans living in the US that stick up their noses at the MLS. In order to do this the MLS needs to help the 4-5 bigger market/profitable teams have the freedom to go after world class players.

  • Andy

    more info at http://www.mlssoccer.com/regulations

    In general, I disagree w/ Tom – I’d rather have a league where each team is competitive, or at least has a reasonable chance to be competitive next year.  The NASL’s downfall was that every game not involving the Cosmos was eventually lame and pointless.  1977-1980 were great years for NASL, but by 1982, when the Cosmos won their 5th championship in 7 seasons, attendance sucked, and the leagues last year was 1984 once the Cosmos could no longer spend money. Allowing a few big markets to sign a bunch of big names could lead to the same thing in MLS: nobody would ever watch a game between Kansas City and San Jose.

    And I think Allocation money’s goal is all about league parity.

  • Andy

    correction: 1982 was the 4th in 6 seasons for the cosmos, but the point is the same…

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_Soccer_League

  • marcus

    Well I really do like the fact that MLS is trying to level the playing field and give every team a chance to win… Thats how it should be, thats how you keep the fans. In Europe though, where the sport is more developed, they have the luxury of having the biggest markets always winning (i.e. in the EPL, Man U, Chelsea, Arsenal are always favorites) but thats because there is passion for even the smallest of clubs in europe. Even if their teams dont win people show up. In the US where MLS is not quite as developed if your team isn’t winning your most likely only going to see the most hardcore of fans showing up and that isnt very many.

  • Tom Paine

    Andy, I agree with your sentiments in the context that in order for the MLS to remain a viable league in it’s infancy, it has to have parity.

    My point was that if the MLS ever wants to take the next step and be considered a world class league where upcoming and current stars want to play (not just where aging ones go to retire), it has to have a handful of clubs that are on par with the big clubs in europe……and in order to reach that point these clubs have to be able to sign big names.

    Will this ever happen? I sure hope it does in my lifetime.  But the MLS is only 14 years old, not 104 years old like the premier league.

  • Ben

    I am also wondering if a team like ours gets any advantage for making lots of money. Can we keep any of it? Can we spend it on everything BUT players?

  • Gilby

    Ben: we don’t get more Cap Space or Allocation money based on our gate but our financial postion gives us a number of advanteages. So far our financial posiont has allowed us to lure Sigi away from the Crew ,invist more in Scouting then other MLS teams and build the facilities at StarFire. .  Also with the new CBA which I’m going to go over in part 2 our finanical position should provide us a few more advantages.

blog comments powered by Disqus

Sounders FC News

GoSOUNDERS on Twitter

  • GoSOUNDERS: Sounders will now host Atlanta in the @usopencup. per @ATLSilverbacks click here (about 9 hours ago)
  • GoSOUNDERS: RT @usopencup: Not surprising, but TheCup.us confirms @ATLSilverbacks & @SoundersFC are in negotiations about who will host the Rd 3 ... (about 10 hours ago)
  • GoSOUNDERS: Sounders will travel to Atlanta to begin their @usopencup defense next week. RT @ATLSilverbacks: FINAL: Silverbacks 1, Georgia Revolution 0 (about 12 hours ago)
  • GoSOUNDERS: UW and Tacoma Tide product. RT @usopencup: RT @atlsilverbacks: GOAL SILVERBACKS! Raphael Cox blasts home. 1-0 in the 61st minute! (about 12 hours ago)
  • GoSOUNDERS: Sounders Academy defender Jalen Markey included. RT @SoccerByIves: U.S. U-18s set for Portugal tournament click here (about 22 hours ago)
  • GoSOUNDERS: RT @eddie_johnson7: Quick turn around game in 72 hours. #rest#recovery #gosounders!!!! (2 days ago)
  • GoSOUNDERS: RT @SoundersFC: UPDATE: Match vs @sjearthquakes on 9/23 moved to 9/22 at 7:30pm PT. click here (5 days ago)
  • GoSOUNDERS: RT @StarfireSports: Time to start rooting for Georgia in the @UsOpenCup. Georgia over Atlanta means a home game for @SoundersFC , An Atl ... (6 days ago)
  • GoSOUNDERS: RT @SoundersFC: Unbeaten streak ends at six as Espindola goal in 51st minute becomes the match-winner. SEA 0:1 RSL. click here (10 days ago)
  • GoSOUNDERS: RT @LiveSounders: Bryan Meredith holds the 4th longest shutout streak to start an MLS career at 225 minutes and counting. (10 days ago)